|
EDUCATION.
The
child has always been of paramount importance in Judaism, as the Mishnah and
Talmud clearly show in several passages. For that matter, Jesus certainly
taught the value of children, in his kindly treatment of them as well as in
his instruction regarding them. Because of this, there are a number of
source-books for the study of education in the biblical period to be found
in the OT, the Apocrypha and the
Mishnah; viz.
Proverbs, Ecclesiasticus, Wisdom of Solomon and
Pirqe Aboth, quite apart
from useful allusions in other books. On the other hand, actual details of
schooling are few; the word ‘school’ occurs but once in
av, and
then refers merely to a lecture-room borrowed by Paul (Acts 19:9), not to
any Jewish or Christian school.
I. Early links with religion
Three events stand out in the history of Jewish
education. They centre on three persons, Ezra, Simon
ben-Shetaḥ and Joshua ben-Gamala.
It was Ezra who established Scripture (such as it was at the time) as the
basis for schooling; and his successors went on to make the synagogue a
place of instruction as well as a place of worship. Simon
ben-Shetaḥ enacted, about 75
bc,
that elementary schooling should be compulsory. Joshua ben-Gamala improved
existing organization, appointing teachers in every province and town, a
century later. But otherwise it is not easy to date innovations. Even the
origins of the synagogue are obscure, though the Exile is a likely time for
their rise. Schürer doubts the
historicity of Simon ben-Shetaḥ‘s
enactment, though most scholars accept it. In any case, Simon did not
institute the elementary school, but merely extended its use. Simon and
Joshua in no way interfered with existing trends and methods, and indeed
Ezra only made more definite the previous linking of religion with everyday
life. So it will prove better to divide the topic by subject rather than
date, since none of the three men made sweeping changes.
II. The development of schools
The place of learning was exclusively the home in the
earliest period, and the tutors were the parents; and teaching in the home
continued to play an important part in the whole of the biblical period. As
it developed, the synagogue became the place of instruction. Indeed, the
NT and Philo support Schürer‘s
view that the synagogue’s purpose was primarily instructional, and only then
devotional; the synagogue ministry of Jesus consisted in ‘teaching’ (cf.
Mt. 4:23). The young were trained in either the synagogue itself or an
adjoining building. At a later stage the teacher sometimes taught in his own
house, as is evidenced by the Aramaic phrase for ‘school’,
bêṯ sāp̱erâ,
literally ‘teacher’s house’. The Temple porticoes, too, proved very useful
for rabbis, and Jesus did much of his teaching there (cf.
Mt. 26:55). By Mishnaic times, eminent rabbis had their own schools for
higher learning. This feature probably started in the time of Hillel and
Shammai, the famed 1st century
bc
rabbis. An elementary school was called bêṯ has-sēp̱er,
‘house of the book’, while a college for higher education was known as
bêṯ miḏrāš, ‘house of
study’.
III. Teaching as a profession
The first tutors were the parents, as we have seen,
except in the case of royal children (cf.
2 Ki. 10:1). The importance of this role is stressed here and there in the
Pentateuch, e.g.
Dt. 4:9. Even as late as the Talmud, it was still the parent’s
responsibility to inculcate the law, to teach a trade and to get his son
married. After the period of Ezra, there arose a new profession, that of the
scribe (sōp̱ēr), the
teacher in the synagogue. The scribes were to change their character by NT
times, however. The ‘wise’, or ‘sages’, seem to have been a different guild
from the scribes, but their exact nature and function are obscure. The
‘sage’ (ḥāḵām) is, of
course, frequently mentioned in Proverbs and later wisdom literature. By the
NT period, there were three grades of teacher, the
ḥāḵām, the sōp̱ēr
and the ḥazzān
(‘officer’), in descending order. Nicodemus was presumably of the highest
grade, the ‘teachers of the law’ (Lk. 5:17, where the
Gk. term is
nomodidaskalos) of the lowest.
The generic term ‘teacher’ (Heb.
melammēḏ;
Aram.
sāp̱erâ)
was usually applied to the lowest grade. But the honorific titles given to
teachers (rabbi, etc.)
indicate the respect in which they were held. Ideally, they were not to be
paid for teaching, but frequently a polite fiction granted them remuneration
for time spent instead of services rendered. Ecclus. 38:24f.
considers manual labour beneath a teacher’s dignity; besides, leisure is a
necessary adjunct to his task. But later on there were many rabbis who
learnt a trade. Paul’s views can be seen in 1 Cor. 9:3ff.
The Talmud gives stringent rulings about the qualifications of teachers; it
is interesting that none of them is academic—they are all moral, except
those that prescribe that he must be male and married.
IV. The scope of education
This was not wide in the early period. The boy would
learn ordinary moral instruction from his mother, and a trade, usually
agricultural, plus some religious and ritual knowledge, from his father. The
interplay of religion and agricultural life would have been self-evident at
every festival (cf.
Lv. 23, passim).
The festivals also taught religious history (cf.
Ex. 13:8). So even at the earliest period everyday life and religious belief
and practice were inseparable. This was the more so in the synagogue, where
Scripture became the sole authority for both belief and daily conduct. Life,
indeed, was itself considered a ‘discipline’ (Heb.
mûsār, a frequent word in Proverbs). Education,
then, was and remained religious and ethical, with Pr. 1:7 its motto. To
read was essential for the study of Scripture; writing was perhaps
lessimportant, although it was known as early as Jdg. 8:14. Basic arithmetic
was taught. Languages were not taught per se,
but note that, as Aramaic became the vernacular, study of the Heb.
Scriptures became a linguistic exercise.
Girls’ education was wholly in their mothers’ hands. They
learnt the domestic arts, simple moral and ethical instruction, and they
were taught to read in order to become acquainted with the law. Their
education was considered important, however, and they were even encouraged
to learn a foreign language. King Lemuel’s mother apparently proved an able
teacher to him (Pr. 31:1); this chapter also shows the character of the
ideal woman.
V. Methods and aims
Methods of instruction were largely by repetition; the
Heb. verb šānâ, ‘repeat’,
came to mean both ‘learn’ and ‘teach’. Mnemonic devices such as acrostics
were therefore employed. Scripture was the textbook, but that other books
were not unknown is evidenced by Ec. 12:12. The value of rebuke was known
(Pr. 17:10), but an emphasis on corporal chastisement is to be found in
Proverbs and Ecclesiasticus. But discipline was much milder in Mishnaic
times.
Until comparatively late times, it was customary for the
pupil to sit on the ground at his teacher’s feet, as did Paul at Gamaliel’s
(Acts 22:3). The bench (sap̱sāl)
was a later invention.
Jewish education’s whole function was to make the Jew
holy, and separate from his neighbours, and to transform the religious into
the practical. Such, then, was normal Jewish education; but undoubtedly
there were schools after a Gk. pattern, especially in the closing centuries
bc,
and indeed Ecclesiasticus may have been written to combat deficiencies in
such non-Jewish instruction. Hellenistic schools were found even in
Palestine, but of course more frequently among Jewish communities elsewhere,
notably in Alexandria.
In the infant church child and parent were told how to
behave towards one another (Eph. 6:1, 4). Church officers had to know how to
rule their own children. There were no Christian schools in early days; for
one thing, the church was too poor to finance them. But the children were
included in the church fellowship, and doubtless received their training
there as well as in the home.
Bibliography.
W. Barclay, Educational Ideals in the Ancient
World, 1959,
chs. I, VI; F. H. Swift,
Education in Ancient Israel,
1919; E. B. Castle, Ancient Education and Today,
1961, ch. V;
TDNT
5, pp. 596-625; entries
s.v.
‘Education’ in
IDB
and EJ.
(*Wisdom; *Wisdom Literature; *Writing.)
av
Authorized Version (King
James’), 1611
Schürer
E. Schürer, A History of the Jewish
People in the Time of Christ, 2 vols.,
E. T. 1885-1901; revised ed., M. Black, G. Vermes and F. Millar
(eds.), 3 vols., 1973-
cf.
confer (Lat.), compare
f. and
the following (verse, etc.)
ff.
and the following (verses, etc.)
TDNT
G. Kittel and G. Friedrich (eds.),
Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament,
1932-74; E. T. Theological Dictionary of
the New Testament, ed. G. W. Bromiley,
10 vols., 1964-76
s.v.
sub verbo (Lat.),
under the word
IDB G.
A. Buttrick et al.
(eds.), The Interpreter’s Dictionary of
the Bible, 4 vols., 1962
EJ. C.
Roth (ed.), Encyclopaedia Judaica,
15 vols., 1971
Douglas, J. (1982; Published in
electronic form by Logos Research Systems, 1996). New Bible
Dictionary. Includes index. (electronic ed. of 2nd ed.). Wheaton,
IL: Tyndale House.
|